It's opposition-style psychological warfar.

 From day one, I did not read Kennedy’s rhetoric as normal intra-party disagreement. I read it for what it is - and I still do.

What he has directed at Dr. Bawumia is not competitive politics. It is opposition-style psychological warfare. These are not policy critiques; they are emotional grenades - designed to destabilise, not persuade. 

Ba

wumia’s faith. 

His ethnicity. 

Samira’s lineage and Fulani parentage. 

The slave smear. None of this is accidental. And none of it is innocent.

That is not how party men argue. That is how adversaries operate.

I have written before - severally, about Kennedy and Alan. I went further than many were comfortable with. I openly questioned the judgment - and, yes, the integrity - of those who rally behind Kennedy’s methods. I did so deliberately, because movements are defined not just by leaders, but by what followers tolerate.

Recent events confirm the hard truth: Kennedy is not fighting to lead the New Patriotic Party. He appears content to preside over its burial.

No one should expect coherence, discipline, or loyalty from that posture.

Let this be said plainly: Dr. Bawumia will win on January 31.

And when the dust settles, the true NPP - its institutional memory, its governing instinct, its sense of history - will return to the fold. The party will regroup, refocus, and prepare for victory in 2028.

Kennedy, however, is structurally incompatible with anything progressive in the NPP. His conduct suggests a man unmoored - politically, strategically, and temperamentally. That is not insult; it is diagnosis by observation.

For rebuilding, reform, or forward motion within the New Patriotic Party, count Kennedy out.

History does not bend to patapaa. It bends to structure, discipline, and purpose.

J. A. Sarbah